Joseph Tucker
Try again with chime
Chime not working for me
https://securelinks.chimebank.com/
Instructions for misconduct complaint ninth judicial
COMPLAINT OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY
To begin the complaint process, complete this form and prepare the brief statement of facts described in item 5 (below). The RULES FOR JUDICIAL-CONDUCT AND JUDICIAL-DISABILITY PROCEEDINGS, adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States, contain information on what to include in a complaint (Rule 6), where to file a complaint (Rule 7), and other important matters. The Ninth Circuit Judicial Council also adopted local misconduct rules. The rules are available in federal court clerks’ offices, on individual federal courts’ websites, and on www.uscourts.gov, and https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/misconduct/rules/.
Your complaint (this form and the statement of facts) should be typewritten and must be legible. Under the Ninth Circuit’s local misconduct rules, you are required to file an original and one copy of (1) the complaint form, (2) the statement of facts, and (3) any documents submitted. Enclose your complaint in an envelope marked “COMPLAINT OF MISCONDUCT” or “COMPLAINT OF DISABILITY”. Do not put the name of any judge on the envelope. All complaints must be mailed to:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Office of the Circuit Executive
P.O. Box 193939
San Francisco, CA 94119-3939
1. Name of Complainant: Contact Address:
Daytime telephone: ( )
2. Name(s) of Judge(s): Court:
3. Does this complaint concern the behavior of the judge(s) in a particular lawsuit or lawsuits?
[ ]Yes [ ]No
If “yes,” give the following information about each lawsuit: Court:
Case Number:
Page 1 of 3
Docket number of any appeal to the Circuit:
Are (were) you a party or lawyer in the lawsuit?
[ ] Party [ ] Lawyer [ ] Neither
If you are (were) a party and have (had) a lawyer, give the lawyer’s name, address, and telephone number:
4. Have you filed any lawsuits against the judge? [ ]Yes [ ]No
If “yes,” give the following information about each such lawsuit: Court:
Case Number:
Present status of lawsuit:
Name, address, and telephone number of your lawyer for the lawsuit against the judge:
Court to which any appeal has been taken in the lawsuit against the judge:
Docket number of the appeal: Present status of the appeal:
5. Brief Statement of Facts. Attach a brief statement of the specific facts on which the claim of judicial misconduct or disability is based. Include what happened, when and where it happened, and any information that would help an investigator check the facts. If the complaint alleges judicial disability, also include any additional facts that form the basis of that allegation. Local Rule 6.1(b) provides that your statement of facts must not be longer than five pages (five sides), or 1,200 words, whichever is less.
You must provide objectively verifiable proof such as the names of witnesses or recorded documents or transcripts to support your allegations. Adverse rulings do not support misconduct allegations, as the appropriate forum for an argument that a judge erred is the appellate court. Thus, you need not include copies of your filings in the underlying case or the judge’s orders because even if a review of those documents is necessary, the documents are accessible via PACER. Excess or irrelevant documentation will be returned to the complainant.
Page 2 of 3
6. Acknowledgment, declaration and signature:
In the space provided below, please write the following statement: “I understand that even if I successfully prove that the judge engaged in misconduct or is disabled, this procedure cannot change the outcome of the underlying case.” (If this statement is not written, your complaint will not be processed and will be returned to you.)
I declare under penalty of perjury that the statements made in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
(Signature)
(Date)
Page 3 of 3
9th judicial district judge Complaint
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Office of the Circuit Executive
P.O. Box 193939
San Francisco, CA 94119-3939
1. Name of Complainant: Clifford Ray Hackett
Contact Address: general delivery Barrigada, GU 96913
Daytime telephone: 671-787-2345.
2. Name of Judge): frances, Gatewood
Court: Guam, District Court
3. Does this complaint concern the behavior of the judge(s) in a particular lawsuit or lawsuits? [x] Yes Case Number: 1:23-cv-00014
Are (were) you a party or lawyer in the lawsuit? [x] Party
4. Have you filed any lawsuits against the judge? [x]No
5. Brief Statement of Facts:
lawsuits filed and settled the same day, with zero cost to both parties. Judge dismissed and closed the cases without allowing settlement agreement to be recorded. Businesses claim they pay the judge protection money and it is obviously true.
6. Acknowledgment, declaration and signature:
“I understand that even if I successfully prove that the judge engaged in misconduct or is disabled, this procedure cannot change the outcome of the underlying case.”
I declare under penalty of perjury that the statements made in this complaint are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
Judge Gatewood order
Page 1 of 4
THE DISTRICT COURT OF GUAM
CLIFFORD HACKETT,
CIVIL CASE NO. 23-00003
Plaintiff,
ORDER
VS.
GUAM AGENCY IN VIDEO 1,
Defendant.
Plaintiff has repeatedly filed Complaints before this court that fail to state a claim and/or lacks Article III standing. There are a total of 20 cases filed by Plaintiff that his court dismissed,
this case included.
A vexatious litigant is one with a history of abuses of the judicial process. See De Long v.
Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1147 (9th Cir. 1990). To prevent the continued abuses, federal courts
have been granted inherent authority to regulate the activities of vexatious litigants through the
imposition of carefully tailored restrictions under appropriate circumstances, such as a pre-filing order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). Id. Such restrictions, however, should be used sparingly and only under extreme circumstances. Id. at 1147. Accordingly, the Ninth Circuit has set forth
the following guidelines before entering a pre-filing order: (a) adequate notice to the plaintiff to
Case 1:23-cv-00003 Document 3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 1 of 4
Page 2 of 4
oppose a restrictive pre-filing order before it is entered; (b) presentation by the trial court of an
adequate record for review; (c) substantive findings concerning the frivolous or harassing nature
of the plaintiff’s filings; and (d) a narrow tailoring of the order to remedy the abuses. Id. at 1147-
48.
a. Notice
The court gives notice to Plaintiff that the court intends to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant. Plaintiff shall have until June 16, 2023, to respond to this court and explain why he should not be declared a vexatious litigant.
b. Record for Review
Below is a list of cases that Plaintiff had filed in this court, all of which were dismissed.
1. Civil Case No. 16-00001, Hackett v. Red Guahan bus 117 Guerro
2. Civil Case No. 16-00005, Hackett v. PMT (Pacific Micronesia Tours)
3. Civil Case No. 16-00007, Hackett v. Guam Sanko Transportation, Inc.
4. Civil Case No. 16-00008, Hackett v. Japan Bus Lines LLC
5. Civil Case No. 16-00010, Hackett v. GRIA
6. Civil Case No. 16-00011, Hackett v. California Pizza Kitchen
7. Civil Case No. 16-00012, Hackett v. Agana Shopping Center
8. Civil Case No. 20-00001, Hackett v. Law Office Bruce Berline et al
9. Civil Case No. 20-00002, Hackett v. Regal Guam
10. Civil Case No. 20-00021, Hackett v. Barrigada Wendy’s
11. Civil Case No. 20-00022, Hackett v. grta.gov
12. Civil Case No. 23-00003, Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video I
13. Civil Case No. 23-00004, Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 2
14. Civil Case No. 23-00005, Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 3
Case 1:23-CV-00003 Document 3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 2 of 4
Page 3 of 4
15. Civil Case No. 23-00006, Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 4
16. Civil Case No. 23-00007, Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 5
17. Civil Case No. 23-00008, Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 6
18. Civil Case No. 23-00009, Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 7
19. Civil Case No. 23-00010, Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 8
20. Civil Case No. 23-00011, Hackett v. Guam Agency in Video 9
c. Frivolous or Harassing Filings
The third factor requires substantive findings concerning the frivolous or harassing nature
of the plaintiff’s filings. "To determine whether a litigant’s actions are frivolous or harassing, the district court must look at both the number and content of the filings as indicia of the
frivolousness of the litigant’s claims." Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp., 500 F.3d 1047, 1059 (9th Cir. 2007) (citations and quotation marks omitted). "An injunction cannot issue merely upon
a showing of litigiousness. The plaintiff’s claims must not only be numerous, but also be patently without merit." Id.
Here, Plaintiff has filed a total of 20 cases in the District Court of Guam. All of them are nearly identical, lacking any specific facts that would establish standing despite this court having
told Plaintiff in previous cases what is needed to establish standing and allowing Plaintiff leave
18
to amend the Complaint. Plaintiff simply continues to ignore the court’s rulings and simply just
19
files a similar complaint, but with just a different named defendant.
20
d. Narrowly Tailored Order
21
Given Plaintiff’s history of filing meritless claims against various defendants, the court is
22
inclined to enjoin Plaintiff from filing any complaint, motion, or other document in the District
23
Court of Guam against any defendants unless and until such a filing is first approved by this
24
court. As noted above, the court will give Plaintiff an opportunity to be heard through his
Case 1:23-cv-00003 Document 3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 3 of 4
Page 4 of 4
pleading, which shall be filed no later than June 16, 2023. Thereafter, the court will then make its final ruling whether it will declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigant.
SO ORDERED.
Is/ Frances M. Tyingco-Gatewood
Chief Judge
Dated: May 17, 2023
C cover
Case 1:23-cv-00003 Document 3 Filed 05/17/23 Page 4
Lawsuit against court judge
Clifford Ray Hackett 3659745@gmail.com 671-787-2345
Plaintiff
vs.
Guam district court
Defendant
Case Number:
Complaint:
1. The Plaintiff brings this lawsuit against the Court, acting at all times through its agent Judge Gatewood, for judicial misconduct, violation of constitutional rights, AND abuse of power.
2. Judge Gatewood presided over multiple cases involving the Plaintiff. During the proceedings, the Judge exhibited extreme prejudice and committed multiple illegal actions against plaintiff.
3. The Plaintiff contends that the actions of Judge Gatewood were in violation of the principles of fairness, impartiality, and due process guaranteed by the Constitution.
4. The Plaintiff suffered harm as a direct result of Judge Gatewood’s actions
5. The Plaintiff seeks appropriate remedies, including but not limited to a formal investigation, disciplinary action against the Judge, or compensation for damages.
6. The Plaintiff requests a trial by jury to address the issues raised in this complaint and to determine the appropriate resolution of this matter.
Wherefore, the Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Court, acting through its agent Judge Gatewood, for such relief as may be just and proper under the circumstances.
Clifford Ray Hackett
Personal lawsuit
COMPLAINT FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff states as follows:
This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Defendant advised and assisted in Crime against plaintiff
Defendant knew that the crime would cause harm and suffering to plaintiff
That the suffering of the plaintiff was directly caused by the illegal actions of defendant..
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands a jury trial and judgment against defendant in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) in compensatory damages, plus interest and costs as this Court deems appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
Solar 