Category Archives: Uncategorized

Election results

2016 US election results

Updates every 30 seconds

Live

OVERVIEW

PRESIDENT

SENATE

HOUSE

GOVERNOR

REFERENDA

Results forAll states

Electoral vote

Popular vote

rjduaUgdE-N0rpVVWh0AXFZTptDbHNIvUhCPlcbtAgevZ4bdA9FZ-Q55evFr4PFV=s64-cc

Clinton

209

Trump

232

FqtZdZXSwMGgYc_xFQbenYkdk3wH5Luyt1IvKfDFXEG9Gr6cPqsVnIUvlomQEqQ=s64-cc

61 needed38 needed

270 to win

CTDCDEMAMDNHNJRIVTALAKAZARCACOFLGAHIIDILINIAKSKYLAMEMIMNMSMOMTNENMNVNYNCNDOHOKORPASCSDTNTXUTVAWAWVWIWY

Won

Leads

No results yet

Swing states

All states

rjduaUgdE-N0rpVVWh0AXFZTptDbHNIvUhCPlcbtAgevZ4bdA9FZ-Q55evFr4PFV=s64-cc

Clinton

FqtZdZXSwMGgYc_xFQbenYkdk3wH5Luyt1IvKfDFXEG9Gr6cPqsVnIUvlomQEqQ=s64-cc

Trump

Alabama

9 electoral votes

35%

565,930

63%

1,026,387

Alaska

3 electoral votes

Results after 4 PM ChST

Arizona

11 electoral votes

46%

727,894

49%

785,099

Arkansas

6 electoral votes

34%

304,922

61%

551,070

California

55 electoral votes

60%

1,999,976

35%

1,150,113

Colorado

9 electoral votes

48%

966,454

44%

892,323

Connecticut

7 electoral votes

51%

506,981

44%

438,395

Delaware

3 electoral votes

53%

235,581

42%

185,103

District of Columbia

3 electoral votes

93%

255,680

4%

11,015

Florida

29 electoral votes

48%

4,445,236

49%

4,577,878

Georgia

16 electoral votes

45%

1,657,575

52%

1,885,839

Hawaii

4 electoral votes

Idaho

4 electoral votes

37%

52,312

52%

74,689

Illinois

20 electoral votes

55%

2,715,406

39%

1,928,936

Indiana

11 electoral votes

38%

979,374

57%

1,497,719

Iowa

6 electoral votes

43%

494,340

52%

599,488

Kansas

6 electoral votes

37%

307,768

57%

474,375

Kentucky

8 electoral votes

33%

628,747

63%

1,202,520

Louisiana

8 electoral votes

37%

725,698

59%

1,164,302

Maine

4 electoral votes

49%

216,275

44%

197,189

Maryland

10 electoral votes

61%

1,486,632

35%

867,354

Massachusetts

11 electoral votes

60%

1,363,270

34%

759,542

Michigan

16 electoral votes

47%

1,412,984

48%

1,453,730

Minnesota

10 electoral votes

50%

936,678

42%

797,904

Mississippi

6 electoral votes

40%

344,086

58%

505,634

Missouri

10 electoral votes

36%

699,470

60%

1,173,934

Montana

3 electoral votes

40%

79,001

53%

103,118

Nebraska

5 electoral votes

35%

210,755

60%

360,265

Nevada

6 electoral votes

50%

369,882

44%

327,157

New Hampshire

4 electoral votes

46%

228,421

48%

237,524

New Jersey

14 electoral votes

54%

1,755,348

43%

1,374,329

New Mexico

5 electoral votes

48%

326,272

40%

270,942

New York

29 electoral votes

61%

3,522,565

36%

2,078,592

North Carolina

15 electoral votes

46%

2,056,016

51%

2,298,792

North Dakota

3 electoral votes

29%

79,998

63%

174,790

Ohio

18 electoral votes

43%

2,260,132

52%

2,732,653

Oklahoma

7 electoral votes

29%

416,602

65%

944,582

Oregon

7 electoral votes

53%

748,705

41%

582,236

Pennsylvania

20 electoral votes

49%

2,412,149

48%

2,359,385

Rhode Island

4 electoral votes

55%

220,313

40%

163,050

South Carolina

9 electoral votes

40%

739,007

56%

1,040,569

South Dakota

3 electoral votes

30%

78,889

63%

163,601

Tennessee

11 electoral votes

31%

655,089

65%

1,385,178

Texas

38 electoral votes

44%

3,445,198

52%

4,090,495

Utah

6 electoral votes

22%

66,212

53%

162,586

Vermont

3 electoral votes

61%

165,961

32%

87,840

Virginia

13 electoral votes

48%

1,755,017

46%

1,676,156

Washington

12 electoral votes

48%

627,610

45%

590,070

West Virginia

5 electoral votes

27%

181,896

68%

466,274

Wisconsin

10 electoral votes

46%

1,018,669

49%

1,102,494

Wyoming

3 electoral votes

22%

41,254

70%

130,193

Sources: AP, Learn More

Feedback

Top stories

2016 Election Night: Live coverage and results

FiveThirtyEight – 4 mins ago

Presidential Election Results – Election Results 2016

New York Times – 6 mins ago

null

Who’s Winning the 2016 US Presidential Election – Live Results

CBS News – 17 hours ago

2016 Election Night: Live coverage and results | FiveThirtyEight

LIVE

fivethirtyeight.com › live-blog › 2016-el…

A New Narrative About White Voters

How to think about this election: white working class voters just decided to vote like a minority group. They’re >40% of the electorate.Is this right? If so, what does it mean?Well, time for my mantra of the evening: We don’t know everything, and it’s not over yet. But this seems like a plausible way to think about this election. What it means seems fairly simple: Some subset of white voters is now conscious of a racial identity, and that consciousness is informing their vote. This…

4 mins ago – View more

Ron Johnson, the incumbent Republican senator from Wisconsin, will keep his seat. Our model now gives Republicans a 97 percent chance of retaining control of the Senate.

5 mins ago – View more

Fact is, unless Clinton somehow wins in Arizona, Trump is going to be the next president.

8 mins ago – View more

null

8 mins ago – View more

null

9 mins ago – View more

The marijuana ballot measure in Massachusetts passed, legalizing medical pot for specific debilitating medical conditions. With 53 percent in favor and 47 percent opposed, the results lined up with the polls we looked at.

9 mins ago – View more

Some Democrats Don’t Have Much Of A Plan For A Trump Presidency

We gave Trump a 27 percent chance of winning the election in our final forecast. Other forecasters gave him a much smaller chance — as low as 1 percent. Some people have raised the possibility of complacency among Democratic voters. There certainly seems to have been some among Democratic elected officials. Last week, Kate Nocera of BuzzFeed talked to some who said they basically had no plan for how to deal with a Trump presidency. “It’s never talked about in much depth or detail because…

12 mins ago – View more

Trump wins Iowa. Our model now gives him a 78 percent chance of winning the election.

12 mins ago – View more

Latest updates

The New York Times

Twitter › nytimes

Live 2016 election results, as they come innyti.ms/2eBGLrI

1 hour ago – Twitter

Los Angeles Times

Twitter › latimes

Watch California’s election results come in live:lat.ms/2eThM4o

13 mins ago – Twitter

The Economist

Twitter › TheEconomist

ELECTION RESULTS: our live map is changing as each state declares. Check it outecon.st/2eKzZTWpic.twitter.com/LOtm…

20 mins ago – Twitter

CNN

Twitter › CNN

We’re live with @PrestonCNN and @tomforemancnn. What questions do you have about the current election results?…twitter.com/i/web/st…

9 mins ago – Twitter

Jeremy Heimans

Twitter › jeremyheimans

Whatever the final result I am devastated by the depths of racism and misogyny in the country in which I live #Elections2016

2 hours ago – Twitter

Magui Guillen‏

Twitter › ladylittlemagui

I live in Spain and I can not sleep because I want to know the result of the elections #HillaryClinton 🙏🇺🇸 #ElectionNight

3 mins ago – Twitter

Nicole Brundage

Twitter › nnert11

so where can i see the live results of the election? 🙂

3 mins ago – Twitter

Shane Benjamin

Twitter › Shane_Benjamin

Latest election results here: LIVE BLOG:bit.ly/2fx9aBu Last batch for La Plata County expected at 9:55 p.m.

4 mins ago – Twitter

View on Twitter

2016 Election Day: Trump Wins North Carolina — Live Results and Analysis

Wall Street Journal › livecoverage › 201…

2 mins ago – 2016 Election Day: Trump Wins Florida — Live Results and Analysis. Last Updated Nov 8, 2016 at …

Who’s Winning the 2016 US Presidential Election – Live Results – CBS News

CBS News › news › presidential-election-…

1 hour ago – CBS News Election Center:Live results; House races live -blog; Senate races live-blog. In order to win …

Live election results and coverage – CNNPolitics.com – CNN.com

CNN.com › 2016/11/07 › politics › live-…

9 mins ago – Cuban vote could swayelection in Florida. … Washington (CNN)Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump wait for voters’ verdict. Follow all the latest here with live updates and analysis.

Live Presidential Forecast – Election Results 2016 – The New York Times

The New York Times › forecast › president

Watch election returns like an expert. …Live Presidential Forecast. 11:45: 58 PM ET. View forecast. Presidential …

Presidential Election Results – Election Results 2016 – The New York Times

The New York Times › results › president

7 mins ago – Results are coming in and we’re live forecasting the outcome. Here’s the full list of poll closing times …

2016 Election Results: President Live Map by State, Real-Time Voting …

Politico › 2016-election › map › president

POLITICO’s Live 2016 Election Results and Maps by State, County and District. Includes Races for President, Senate, …

US elections 2016 live results: track who is winning, county by county | US news …

The Guardian › … › US elections 2016

7 hours ago – Follow along throughout the night as America finds out who won the presidential race between …

Next

Tamuning, Guam – Reported by this phone

Learn more

Terms

Measure Wind Speed with Your Own Wind Meter – Scientific American

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/bring-science-home-wind-speed/

Have you ever wondered how wind is made? Wind is caused by a difference in air pressure. Air travels from areas of higher pressure to places where there is less pressure. And just as air flows out of the high-pressure inside an inflated balloon if the opening is not tied, air in the atmosphere will move to a lower pressure area, creating wind. The speed of that wind can be measured using a tool called an anemometer.

An anemometer looks like a weather vane, but instead of measuring which direction the wind is blowing with pointers, it has four cups so that it can more accurately measure wind speed. Each cup is attached to the end of a horizontal arm, each of which is mounted on a central axis, like spokes on a wheel. When wind pushes into the cups, they rotate the axis. The faster the wind, the faster the cups spin the axis. How fast will your homemade anemometer whirl?

Background
Air is made up of tiny molecules. When molecules are heated, they move faster. Consequently, when air is heated, its molecules move faster and become spaced farther apart, which makes the air less dense (meaning that there are fewer molecules in a given volume). This also means that the air has a lower overall pressure. In comparison, cold air is made of more tightly packed molecules, and so it is denser and has relatively higher pressure.

Because air pressures are inclined to balance out, when there is an area of relatively lower air pressure, the surrounding air in higher pressure areas moves in. This movement of air from a higher pressure area to a relatively lower pressure area is what generates wind. When wind pushes the cups on the anemometer, they spin around the central axis. How fast the cups revolve can be measured in revolutions per minute (rpm), or how many times one cup returns to the position where it started in one minute. Consequently, faster wind will result in a higher rpm than will a slower air movement.

Materials
• Five three-ounce paper cups (such as Dixie Cups)
• Paper hole punch or sharpened pencil
• Ruler
• Two straws
• Pin
• Stapler
• Pencil with eraser
• Fan with different speeds (optional)
• Timer (optional)

Preparation
• Prepare four cups this way: Punch one hole in the side of each cup, about one half an inch below the rim.
• For the fifth cup, punch four equally spaced holes in its sides, about one quarter an inch below the rim. Also punch one hole in the center of the bottom.

Procedure
• Take a single-hole cup and push a straw through the hole until about one inch of the straw is inside the cup. Make sure the straw is horizontal and staple it to the side of the cup. Repeat this with another single-hole cup and straw.
• Push the empty end of each straw into one of the side holes in the five-hole cup and out the one across from it. Turn the cups so that they face the same direction. Why do you think the cups should face the same direction?
• Push the empty ends of each straw protruding from the fifth cup into the other two single-hole cups until about one inch of the straw is inside each cup. Turn the new cups so all the bottoms of the cups face the same direction. Staple the ends of the straws to the side of each cup like you did for the first two cups.
• After making sure all cups are about the same distance from the center of the five-hole cup, carefully push the pin through the two straws where they intersect, in the middle of the five-hole cup. Use caution when handling the sharp pin. Why do you think it is important to use something as small as a pin for this?
• Push the pencil through the hole in the bottom of the five-hole cup, eraser-end first, until it reaches the straws. Carefully push the pin into the eraser.
• The anemometer is now ready to measure wind speeds. : If you have a fan that turns at different speeds, hold the anemometer in front of the fan and count the number of times one cup completely turns around for 15 seconds, then multiply that value by four. This number will be in revolutions per minute (rpm). …xtra: What is the speed of the wind outside? …?To determine this, first calculate the circumference of the circle made by the rotating cups by measuring the distance around the circle that they make (using a tape measure or a piece of string you can measure with a ruler). Then convert this to miles by dividing the number of inches by 12 to get feet and then dividing that number by 5,280 (the number of feet in a mile). Multiply this number by rpm. Finally, divide your product by 60 (to convert minutes to hours) and you will have an approximation of the velocity at which the anemometer is spinning (in mph), although this does not take friction in to account.

We can kill by cell phone

A directed-energy weapon (DEW) emits highly focused energy, transferring that energy to a target to damage it.

Potential applications of this technology include anti-personnel weapon systems, potential missile defense system, and the disabling of lightly armored vehicles such as cars, drones, watercraft, and electronic devices such as mobile phones.

The Pentagon is researching technologies like directed-energy weapon and railguns to counter maturing threats posed by missile and hypersonic glide vehicles. These systems of missile defense are expected to come online in the mid to late-2020s.

Operational advantages

Directed energy weapons could have several main advantages over conventional weaponry:

Direct energy weapons can be used discreetly as radiation above and below the visible spectrum is invisible and does not generate sound.[4][5]
Light is only very slightly affected by gravity.

Microwave weapons
Although some devices are labelled as microwave weapons, the microwave range is commonly defined as being between 300 MHz and 300 GHz which is within the RF range. Some examples of weapons which have been publicized by the military are as follows:

Active Denial System is a millimeter wave source that heats the water in the target’s skin and thus causes incapacitating pain. It is being used by the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory and Raytheon for riot-control duty. Though intended to cause severe pain while leaving no lasting damage, concern has been voiced as to whether the system could cause irreversible damage to the eyes. There has yet to be testing for long-term side effects of exposure to the microwave beam. It can also destroy unshielded electronics: see TEMPEST (research into unintended electronic release of information). The device comes in various sizes including attached to a humvee.
Vigilant Eagle is an airport defense system that directs high-frequency microwaves towards any projectile that is fired at an aircraft. The system consists of a missile-detecting and tracking subsystem (MDT), a command and control system, and a scanning array. The MDT is a fixed grid of passive infrared (IR) cameras. The command and control system determines the missile launch point. The scanning array projects microwaves that disrupt the surface-to-air missile’s guidance system, deflecting it from the aircraft.
Bofors HPM Blackout is a high-powered microwave weapon system which is stated to be able to destroy at distance a wide variety of commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) electronic equipment. It is stated to be not lethal to humans.
The effective radiated power (ERP) of the EL/M-2080 Green Pine radar makes it a possible candidate for conversion into a directed-energy weapon, by focusing pulses of radar energy on target missiles. The energy spikes are tailored to enter missiles through antennas or sensor apertures where they can fool guidance systems, scramble computer memories or even burn out sensitive electronic components.
AESA radars mounted on fighter aircraft have been slated as directed energy weapons against missiles, however, a senior US Air Force officer noted: "they aren’t particularly suited to create weapons effects on missiles because of limited antenna size, power and field of view".Potentially lethal effects are produced only inside 100 metres range, and disruptive effects at distances on the order of one kilometre. Moreover, cheap countermeasures can be applied to existing missiles.
Electrolaser
Main article: Electrolaser
An electrolaser lets ionization occur, and then sends a powerful electric current down the conducting ionized track of plasma so formed, somewhat like lightning. It functions as a giant high energy long-distance version of the Taser or stun gun.

Pulsed energy projectile
Main article: Pulsed energy projectile
Pulsed Energy Projectile or PEP systems emit an infrared laser pulse which creates rapidly expanding plasma at the target. The resulting sound, shock and electromagnetic waves stun the target and cause pain and temporary paralysis. The weapon is under development and is intended as a non-lethal weapon in crowd control though it can also be used as a lethal weapon.

A Dazzler is a directed-energy weapon intended to temporarily blind or disorient its target with intense directed radiation. Targets can include sensors or human vision. Dazzlers emit infrared or invisible light against various electronic sensors, and visible light against humans, when they are intended to cause no long-term damage to eyes. The emitters are usually lasers, making what is termed a laser dazzler. Most of the contemporary systems are man-portable, and operate in either the red (a laser diode) or green (a diode-pumped solid-state laser, DPSS) areas of the electromagnetic spectrum.

Initially developed for military use, non-military products are becoming available for use in law enforcement and security.

Weapons designed to cause permanent blindness are banned by the 1995 United Nations Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons. The dazzler is a non-lethal weapon intended to cause temporary blindness or disorientation and therefore falls outside this protocol.

PHASR Rifle
The personnel halting and stimulation response rifle (PHASR) is a prototype non-lethal laser dazzler developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Directed Energy Directorate, U.S. Department of Defense Its purpose is to temporarily disorient and blind a target. Blinding laser weapons have been tested in the past, but were banned under the 1995 UN Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons, which the United States acceded to on 21 January 2009.[19] The PHASR rifle, a low-intensity laser, is not prohibited under this regulation, as the blinding effect is intended to be temporary. It also uses a two-wavelength laser.[The PHASR was tested at Kirtland Air Force Base, part of the Air Force Research Laboratory Directed Energy Directorate in New Mexico.

Soviet laser pistol was a prototype weapon designed for cosmonauts.

Project Excalibur was a United States government nuclear weapons research program to develop a nuclear pumped x-ray laser as a directed energy weapon for ballistic missile defence.
In 1984 the Soviet Strategic Missile Troops military academy developed the first handheld laser weapon, intended for use by cosmonauts in outer space.
In 1987 a Soviet laser-armed orbital weapon system, the 17F19DM Polyus/Skif-DM, failed during deployment.
In 1991 scientists at the US Army Missile Command developed and field tested a ruggedized tunable laser emitting in yellow-orange-red part of the spectrum.
Made by Northrop Grumman:
On March 18, 2009 Northrop Grumman announced that its engineers in Redondo Beach had successfully built and tested an electric laser capable of producing a 100-kilowatt ray of light, powerful enough to destroy cruise missiles, artillery, rockets and mortar rounds. An electric laser is capable of being mounted in an aircraft, ship, or vehicle because it requires much less space for its supporting equipment than a chemical laser.
On April 6, 2011, the U.S. Navy successfully tested a laser gun, manufactured by Northrop Grumman, that was mounted on the former USS Paul Foster, which is currently used as the navy’s test ship. When engaged during the test that occurred off the coast of Central California in the Pacific Ocean test range, the laser gun was documented as having "a destructive effect on a high-speed cruising target," said Chief of Naval Research Admiral Nevin Carr. While classified, the proposed range of the laser gun is measured in miles, not yards.
Northrop Grumman has announced the availability of a high-energy solid-state laser weapon system that they call FIRESTRIKE, introduced on 13 November 2008. The system is modular, using 15 kW modules that can be combined to provide various levels of power.
On 19 July 2010 an anti-aircraft laser described as the Laser Close-In Weapon System was unveiled at the Farnborough Airshow.
The ZEUS-HLONS (HMMWV Laser Ordnance Neutralization System) is the first laser and the first energy weapon of any type to be used on a battlefield. It is used for neutralizing mines and unexploded ordnance.
Laser Area Defense System.
The Mid-Infrared Advanced Chemical Laser (MIRACL) is an experimental U.S. Navy deuterium fluoride laser and was tested against an Air Force satellite in 1997.
In 2011, the U.S. Navy began to test the Maritime Laser Demonstrator (MLD), a laser for use aboard its warships.
In 2013 the U.S. began field testing a directed-energy weapon it calls the Laser Weapon System.
Personnel Halting and Stimulation Response, or PHaSR, is a non-lethal hand-held weapon developed by the United States Air Force. Its purpose is to "dazzle" or stun a target. It was developed by Air Force’s Directed Energy Directorate.
Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL) is a weaponized deuterium fluoride laser developed in a joint research project by Israel and the U.S. It is designed to shoot down aircraft and missiles. See also National missile defense.
Soviet/Russian Beriev A-60: a CO2 gas laser mounted on an Ilyushin Il-76MD transport.
The U.S. Air Force’s Airborne Laser, or Advanced Tactical Laser, was a plan to mount a CO2 gas laser or COIL chemical laser on a modified Boeing 747 to shoot down missiles.
High Energy Laser-Mobile Demonstrator (HEL-MD) is a Boeing designed laser system mounted on a Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck. Its current power level is 10 kW, which will be boosted to 50 kW, and expected to eventually be upgraded to 100 kW. Targets that can be engaged are mortar rounds, artillery shells and rockets, unmanned aerial vehicles, and cruise missiles. Lockheed Martin is developing a 60 kW fiber laser to mount on the HEL-MD that maintains beam quality at high power outputs while using less electricity than solid-state lasers.
I have also helped to develop
Portable Efficient Laser Testbed (PELT)
Laser AirCraft CounterMeasures (ACCM)

Legally get away with murder

Article III of the Constitution requires federal criminal trials to be held in the state in which the crime was committed. And the Sixth Amendment entitles a federal criminal defendant to a trial by jurors living in the state and district where the crime was committed. But if someone committed a crime in the uninhabited Idaho portion of Yellowstone, it would be impossible to form a jury. And being federal land, the state would have no jurisdiction. Here is a clear constitutional provision enabling criminal immunity in 50 square miles of America’s oldest national park