Category Archives: Uncategorized

Joker movie controversy


The fight over Joker and the new movie’s “dangerous” message, explained
Joaquin Phoenix’s Joker is the subject of a furious debate. The movie hasn’t even been released yet.

By Alex Abad-Santos on September 25, 2019 3:43 pm


Joaquin Phoenix as Joker. Warner Bros.
Joker, a glimpse into the life of Batman’s psychotic arch-nemesis, has somehow become one of the most-reviled and most-defended movies of the year, weeks before being released in theaters. (It comes out on October 4.)

Starring Joaquin Phoenix and directed by Todd Phillips, the movie has already been deemed dangerous by its vocal critics, akin to an incel training manual. To some of the movie’s fans, those critical reviews and negative reactions are just another example of social justice warrior overreach. And in recent days, Joker’s studio Warner Bros. and family members of those killed in the 2012 Aurora, Colorado, mass shooting have been in conversation over the possible danger the movie poses to moviegoers.

What’s most striking about this nascent debate is that the only people who have seen the movie thus far are select film critics and festivalgoers. But most of the conversation surrounding Joker is among those who haven’t seen it.

RELATED

The Joker never needed an origin story, but especially not this one
It’s a testament to the iconic supervillain’s popularity that the movie’s two trailers have ignited a full-blown fight about the movie. The character’s depravity and ghastliness are what make him Batman’s greatest foe. Those same qualities instill a fear and disgust among his most vocal critics, especially when the evils of our reality have slowly shifted in that direction.


But the fight over Joker is not just about the film but about how we watch movies today, how we discuss their value, and our tendency to think about movies in a way that is at odds with the very existence of the art itself.

Joker could be validation for violent glory seekers
The backlash over Joker is not unfamiliar. Batman’s Joker has always been a ghoulish figure capable of immense horrors, and his existence in comic books has been met with questions of whether writers and artists sometimes go too far in depicting his villainy (i.e. his sadism, his violence, his abusive relationship with Harley Quinn), even straying into glamorization.

The peculiar part is the backlash and debate are based merely on the premise of the movie and the film’s two major trailers released so far. The general public hasn’t yet seen the movie but people have already written it off or written off the people who have written it off. The major flashpoint occurred late last month when Warner Bros. released the movie’s final pre-release trailer:


The trailer is edited to convey a digestible, linear origin story for the Joker. Troubled guy Arthur Fleck just wants to make people laugh; people don’t understand him; one final straw turns him into the ghoulish villain known as the Joker.

Fleck’s social awkwardness is emphasized throughout the trailer. He is so unlikable, we’re meant to think, that even his own social worker doesn’t want to deal with him anymore. Fleck’s reaction is caustic.

“You just don’t listen, do you?” Fleck tells her in an escalating voiceover, as a shot of him in a sad clown costume getting beat up plays. “You just ask the same questions every week.”

Because of how he’s been treated, Fleck goes from a mostly harmless nobody into a villainous somebody. If society had treated him better, the trailer seems to assert, the Joker would have never existed.

Joker’s most vocal critics thus far are concerned that in the United States’ current climate, giving the spotlight to the character emboldens and galvanizes a type of thinking that can inspire mass shooters.

Joker’s win at the Venice Film Festival helped to fuel this argument as its critics pointed out that the honor sent an even more disturbing message: that art that encourages violence may be rewarded.

The negative reactions to Joker seem largely fueled by the current climate of mass shootings in the US. In August, the mass shootings in El Paso and Dayton left a total of more than 30 deaths and dozens of injuries, and the white 21-year-old gunman in the El Paso shooting had posted an online manifesto filled with xenophobic and racist rhetoric. And it’s hard not to see the Joker on a killing spree and think of the Aurora, Colorado, theater shooting in 2012 at a showing of another movie in the Batman universe, The Dark Knight Rises, or, for that matter, any of the 2,220 mass shootings since the one at Sandy Hook, Connecticut, seven years ago.

“My worry is that one person who may be out there — and who knows if it is just one — who is on the edge, who is wanting to be a mass shooter, may be encouraged by this movie. And that terrifies me,” Sandy Phillips (no relation to the director) told the Hollywood Reporter on August 24.

Sandy Phillips’s daughter was killed in the 2012 shooting, and she is part of a group of Aurora victims’ family members urging Warner Bros. to be more cognizant of the movie’s potential impact. The group sent a letter to the studio urging caution about the movie’s themes and to donate to charities that support victims of gun violence.

When we learned that Warner Bros. was releasing a movie called “Joker” that presents the character as a protagonist with a sympathetic origin story, it gave us pause. We want to be clear that we support your right to free speech and free expression. But as anyone who has ever seen a comic book movie can tell you: with great power comes great responsibility. That’s why we’re calling on you to use your massive platform and influence to join us in our fight to build safer communities with fewer guns.
Some critics also voiced this concern about how the movie portrays violence, especially violence that is so intertwined with our own realities, in their reviews.

“For so many tragic reasons, the American imagination has of late been preoccupied with the motivations of disaffected white men who’ve turned violent — a nation (or part of one) trying to diagnose and explain them, one mass killing after another,” Vanity Fair’s Richard Lawson wrote in his review of Joker, summing up our current relationship to shootings and their perpetrators. Today’s America is fascinated by perpetrators and their motivations, and that obsession is most visible in popular culture.

“[T]hose angry loners — the ones who shoot up schools and concerts and churches, who gun down the women and men they covet and envy, who let loose some spirit of anarchic animus upon the world — there’s almost a woebegone mythos placed on them in the search for answers,” he added.

The debate over glamorizing the Joker is part of the Joker’s history
The concern that Joker will idealize Fleck for viewers who see themselves in him isn’t new for the character. Back in 2015, a similar controversy arose from a variant cover of Batgirl in which the Joker is painting his red, ghastly smile on his apparent hostage, Batgirl, who is quivering in fear.

The cover alludes to the famous and controversial 1988 comic The Killing Joke, written by Alan Moore and drawn by Brian Bolland, that delves into the psyche and depravity of the Joker before he psychologically tortures Batman (and Gordon and Gordon’s father) to Batman’s breaking point. Part of that torture involves Joker paralyzing and sexually assaulting Batgirl, a.k.a. Barbara Gordon.

Moore himself has expressed regret with the way he wrote the story, saying that it was too “nasty” and that he went over the line specifically with his abusive treatment of Batgirl. He explained why in a 2006 interview with Wizard Magazine:

I asked DC if they had any problem with me crippling Barbara Gordon — who was Batgirl at the time — and if I remember, I spoke to Len Wein, who was our editor on the project … [He] said, ‘Yeah, okay, cripple the bitch.’ It was probably one of the areas where they should’ve reined me in, but they didn’t.
The Killing Joke (along with its various adaptations) has been further critiqued, including for many choices Moore says he regrets, like its sexism and its violence. Even with Moore’s rebuke of the work, it’s still one of those mythic, untouchable comic book tomes. It remains widely beloved for its audacity in showing us the Joker at his monstrous worst, but also in showing us that he and Batman are both just men, brought together by a thin, ghoulish twist of fate.

“As I said, [The Killing Joke] was meant to be something that would liberate comics,” Moore said in an interview with the (now-defunct) pop culture site Mania. “Instead, it became this massive stumbling block that comics can’t even really seem to get around to this day. They’ve lost a lot of their original innocence, and they can’t get that back. And, they’re stuck, it seems, in this kind of depressive ghetto of grimness and psychosis.”

Superhero stories post-The Killing Joke have also leaned into psychologically investigating their villains. Delving into a character’s jagged, shattered psyche has become both commonplace and popular with readers, but indulging fascination is rarely distinguished from titillation. Therein is the worry: A character meant to be despised and ghoulish becomes mythologized, or even something of an idol.

How the backlash against Joker explains how we talk about movies
While the idea of someone getting inspired and thrilled by the Joker and then emulating him is disturbing, it’s difficult to voice that concern without it coming across like anticipatory virtue signaling — or placing an undue burden on art itself to protect its viewers from immorality.

“If filmmakers are expected to constantly answer for the worst things their audiences might ever think, no art of value would ever get made,” my colleague and Vox critic-at-large Emily VanDerWerff wrote about the controversies wrapped around Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time In Hollywood.

This same sentiment could easily apply to Joker.

That we sometimes put the onus on filmmakers to manage audiences’ potential reactions to their work says a lot about how we watch movies and absorb art today: There’s a large desire to interpret movies — including how they’re made, who’s making them, and who’s starring in them — as moral instruction. Joker, to its biggest critics, is seemingly absent of that instruction or, even worse, bolsters the belief in taking action against a society that doesn’t understand you.

“As Hannah Arendt saw banality in the supposed evil of the Nazi Adolf Eichmann, I see in Joker an attempt to elevate nerdy revenge to the plane of myth,” New York’s David Edelstein wrote in his review. “That’s scary on a lot of different levels.”

Hence the worry that men will get the wrong impression from it. But Joker director Todd Phillips said in an interview with the AP on August 31 that he doesn’t believe that’s the case with his movie or others. Movies are “mirrors of society, but they’re never molders,” he said, and the violence depicted in his movie isn’t sensationalized.

“We tried to paint it with as realistic brush as possible so when it comes it can feel like a punch in the stomach,” he told the AP.

In another interview with the Associated Press on September 24, the director talked about the Aurora, Colorado, mass shooting and its connection to Joker. “I mean, I think that Aurora is obviously a horrible, horrible situation, but even that is not something you blame on the movie,” he said. “Quite frankly, if you do your own research about Aurora, that gentleman wasn’t even going in as Joker. That was misreported — his hair was dyed red. He was having, obviously, a mental breakdown and there’s something horrifying about that but it wasn’t related to it outside of the fact that it happened at a movie theater.”

Warner Bros. released a statement that day as well, responding to both the Aurora family members and the general conversation about the movie possibly glamorizing the Joker. It made clear that it heard the concerns from Joker’s biggest critics. The studio wrote:

Gun violence in our society is a critical issue, and we extend our deepest sympathy to all victims and families impacted by these tragedies. Our company has a long history of donating to victims of violence, including Aurora, and in recent weeks, our parent company joined other business leaders to call on policymakers to enact bi-partisan legislation to address this epidemic. At the same time, Warner Bros. believes that one of the functions of storytelling is to provoke difficult conversations around complex issues. Make no mistake: neither the fictional character Joker, nor the film, is an endorsement of real-world violence of any kind. It is not the intention of the film, the filmmakers or the studio to hold this character up as a hero.
In its statement, Warner Bros. maintains that the film doesn’t hold Joker “up as a hero” and that, in the studio’s eyes, it believes that people seeing the movie will come away with the clear notion that the film doesn’t endorse violence.

And while Warner Bros. is trying to make a claim about the lessons its movie will teach, it also highlights how we talk about movies being good or bad based on the lessons they teach. The way in which we ultimately determine something is dangerous or bad for us doesn’t just apply to movies that we’re not “supposed” to like.

Earlier this year, the Mary Sue, a feminist site that focuses on geek culture, got into a bit of trouble for a headline and tweet erroneously declaring that all the negative reviews of Captain Marvel were from men. Ergo, these men were sexist, implying that not liking Marvel’s first solo superhero movie about a woman meant having an issue with the female lead, not the movie itself. Never mind the number of women critics who didn’t enjoy the movie, the article seemed to suggest.

When the Mary Sue’s assertion was disproved, it illuminated the fallacy of connecting someone’s personal beliefs to their appreciation, or lack thereof, for a big film hit like Captain Marvel. Joker seems likely to be subject to the same connections: that enjoying Arthur Fleck as a character and his film as a whole is analogous to promoting incels or hateful online forum users.

I’ve yet to see Joker (our own critic said it’s a middling movie), and I truly affirm anyone’s right to hate or love Joker all they want. I just hope someone actually sees it before coming to that conclusion.

Next Up In Culture
Watch: Margot Robbie’s Harley Quinn takes center stage in the trailer for Birds of Prey
The Trump-Ukraine story shows the power of conspiracy theories
Stranger Things season 4 is just the start of Netflix’s new deal with the Duffer brothers
5 winners and 7 losers from a Succession that had much more embarrassment than usual
ABC’s Stumptown is the scuzzy private-eye show we need right now
SNL pokes fun at the impeachment inquiry with a desperate Donald Trump
Back to top ↑
Terms of Use / Privacy Policy

© 2019 Vox Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved

China can nuke Us in 30 minutes

China set to unveil Dongfeng-41 nuke that ‘can strike US in 30 minutes’ at 70th anniverary parade
By Jon Lockett
30th September 2019, 11:25 pm
Updated: 30th September 2019, 11:25 pm
51 COMMENTS
CHINA will unveil the “ultimate doomsday weapon” on Tuesday during one of the nation’s biggest military parades, say worrying reports.
The super-nuke is expected to take centre stage at a huge arms showcase held in Tiananmen Square, Beijing, to mark 70 years of Communist rule.


The Dongfeng-41 is a nuke that ‘can strike the US in 30 minutes’ travelling at 7,600mph
The Dongfeng-41, is a 7,600 mph intercontinental ballistic missile that is said to have the furthest range of any nuclear missile and could reach the US in 30 minutes.

Speculation has been rife as to what weapons will be unveiled, with parade rehearsals showing missiles and aircraft under camouflage wraps.

The Chinese government is keen to assert its dominance in Asia and particularly in the South China Sea where it has been busy building militarised islands in international waters.

And its clear message to the US is that it is getting closer than ever to matching it in terms of military might.

A defence ministry spokesman recently said Beijing had no intention to “flex its muscles” but was instead keen to show a “peace-loving and responsible China”.


China’s DF-41 is said to be able to carry penetration aids, designed to confuse US missile devices

The high-profile parade will include 15,000 troops, more than 160 aircraft and 580 pieces of military equipment, according to Ministry of Defence spokesman Major General Cai Zhijun.

A supersonic drone, hypersonic missile and a robot submarine could all be shown off.

But all eyes will be primed for whether the huge Dongfeng 41 (DF-41) missile rolls through Tiananmen Square in what would be its debut public appearance.

Many new weapons “will be shown for the first time,” Cai told reporters last week. Asked whether that would include the DF-41, Cai said, “Please wait and see.”

No details of the DF-41 have been released, but the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington said it may have the world’s longest range at 15,000 kilometres.

US nuclear tipped missiles fall a few thousand kilometres short of that.

MOST READ IN NEWS

KILLED IN SLEEP Girl, 14, ‘killed by exploding phone’ after going to bed listening to music

PIZZA HIT Pizza Express customer hits vegan in the face after protesters storm restaurant
Analysts say the DF-41, flying at 25 times the speed of sound, might be able to reach the US in 30 minutes with up to 10 warheads for separate targets.

China’s current mainstay missile the Dongfeng-31 — Dongfeng means “east wind” — has a range of more than 11,200 kilometres that puts most of the continental US within reach.

A version of this story originally appeared on news.com.au.

China tests its multi-nuke hypersonic missile DF-41 which can strike ANYWHERE in the world and ‘will be ready in 2018’

TOPICS NUCLEAR WEAPONS

Galaxy a30 review

Samsung Galaxy A30 review: Good display but disappointing value
The phone’s sleek design with curved edges make it nice to hold, and glossy finish makes it look premium.
By Karan Bajaj, ET Bureau | May 02, 2019, 04.49 PM IST
Agencies
The A30 uses Samsung’s new Exynos 7904 processor.
Rating: 3.5
Price: Rs 16,990

Specs: 6.4-inch super amoled display (2340 x 1080 pixels), octa core Exynos 7904, 4GB RAM, 64GB storage (expandable, dedicated slot), dual SIM, 16MP f1.7 + 5MP f2.2 ultrawide rear camera, 16MP f2.0 front camera, rear fingerprint scanner, USB Type-C, WiFi ac, Bluetooth 5.0, FM radio, 4,000mAh battery, Android 9.0, 165 grams
Pros: Sleek design, great screen, good day-to-day performance, daylight camera capabilities, good battery life, fast charge support
ADVERTISEMENT
Cons: Glossy plastic back picks up smudges and scratches easily, camera quality suffers in low light, low speaker output, video recording limited to 1080p
Samsung recently confirmed that the J series range of smartphone will be replaced with the A series. This is one of the reasons we have been seeing an increase in the number of new phones across different price points. The A30 has premium features like amoled display at a mid-range price.

The phone has a 6.4-inch full HD super amoled display with an Infinity U style notch. Samsung makes impressive smartphone displays and this is no exception. The screen is gorgeous with deep blacks and vibrant colour. Plus, the slim bezels on the sides and a small chin adds to the immersive experience for multimedia and gaming. Full marks to Samsung here.

The A30 has a dual rear camera with 16MP f1.7 primary sensor and a secondary ultra-wide 5MP sensor.
The A30 uses Samsung’s new Exynos 7904 processor which we saw first on the Galaxy M20. Our review unit came with 4GB RAM and 64GB storage along with a 4,000mAh battery. Like the M20, the Galaxy A30 can handle most games. PUBG and Asphalt 9 will work on medium settings without an issue.

Even for day-to-day use, the A30 is a capable performer. If you try to tax it with multiple apps in the background, you will see some sluggishness. While this may not be a deal-breaker on a Rs13k Galaxy M20, this is an issue on a Rs 17k phone like this. A Rs14k Redmi Note 7 pro with Snapdragon 675 will soundly thrash the Exynos 7904 in terms of outright performance. Thankfully, battery life is stellar – we regularly got a full day of battery life with around 20-25% spare. If you use the phone with battery saving enabled, it easily lasts a day and a half.
In the camera department, the A30 has a dual rear camera with 16MP f1.7 primary sensor and a secondary ultra-wide 5MP sensor. It’s nice to have that ultra-wide lens, especially in the sub-Rs20k segment since it opens up more shooting options. The image quality from the A30’s camera is great: daylight photos have excellent details and natural colour. In low light, the photos were well lit thanks to the wide aperture but on closer inspection you will see that they lack detail. Live focus mode for portraits also works better in daylight – good amount of bokeh but the edge detection is not the best we have seen. Video recording quality from the rear camera is good but is limited to full HD resolution and does not have any electronic image stabilization.

If you use the phone with battery saving enabled, it easily lasts a day and a half.
There are several things we did like on the Galaxy A30. It’s got a sleek design with curved edges which makes it nice to hold. The glossy finish looks premium, the fingerprint scanner is fast and the face unlock is better than the M series phones. What we did not like was that the glossy plastic back panel picks up smudges/scratches very quickly – it has several scratches within a week of careful use. Also, the loudspeaker volume is low. Sound from videos was hard to hear at full volume in an office environment.
At Rs 17k, the Galaxy A30 seems overpriced compared to Samsung’s own Galaxy M30. The M30 gives you a triple camera, larger 5,000mAh battery and similar hardware for Rs 14,999. You can also consider the Oppo K1 in the same price segment – it has an in-display fingerprint scanner, a better Snapdragon 660 processor and equally good cameras.

0:00
/ 6:52




In Video: Samsung Galaxy M30: Unboxing and First Look
Get Real-time Business
News Notifications

Get notified like millions of our users.Allow Notifications Now
Download
The Economic Times News App for
Live Elections News & Results, Latest News in Business, Share Market & More.
Related Articles
Oppo K1 review: Good performance & battery life, great camera quality
SPONSORED: In the Store
Crafted for Amazon – 10.or Cosmos Smartwatch with GPS and Transreflective Display
₹3,999
BUY
Crafted for Amazon – 10.or Move+ Fitness Smartwatch with Full Colour Screen
₹1,999
BUY
Crafted for Amazon – 10.or Move Fitness Band with Full Colour Screen
₹1,599
BUY
READ MORE:samsung galaxy a30 |Samsung |phone review |oppo k1 |galaxy a30
How Qatar will cool World Cup stadiums
LATEST COMMENT
very poor quality. Never buy this product .
– Kumud Thakur
VIEW ALL 1 COMMENTADD COMMENT
PREVIOUS
Smriti Irani, Kejriwal’s sons score over 90% in CBSE 12th boards; parents celebrate on Twitter
NEXT
Sheraton’s ‘Heart for the City’ experiential tour now in Bengaluru
SUBSCRIBE TO:
DAILY NEWSLETTER
Your daily dose of business news, views and updates

SUBSCRIBE

Most Recent
Trump officials considering delisting Chinese companies from US exchanges
Top mutual funds risk regulator wrath on Essel debt deadline pact
Saudi attack fallout: Fuel up Rs 2-2.25/Litre in a fortnight
Falling groundwater levels driving farmers in Punjab to move away from paddy
Most Read
It wasn’t even a fraud, RBI decision harsh: Suspended PMC MD Joy Thomas
Trump officials considering delisting Chinese companies from US exchanges: Bloomberg
Go and invest in Pakistan: Jhunjunwala to a British investor
Lockheed to begin supplying F-16 wings from Indian plant in 2020
ADVERTISEMENT

Business News › Magazines › Panache › Samsung Galaxy A30 review: Good display but disappointing value
POPULAR CATEGORIES
PanacheET MagazineTravel
HOT ON WEB
Sensex TodayStock market crashGSTRupeeAadhaar CardRBIHow to save Income TaxCurrency ConverterIncome Tax Calculator
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT
Places to travel in 2018OnePlus 6 First Impressions VideoMukesh AmbaniOnePlus 6 First ImpressionsGadgets NewsGalaxy Note 8 ReviewDeepika Ranveer weddingRedmi Note 6 Pro Review
MORE FROM OUR NETWORK
इकनॉमिक टाइम्सઈકોનોમિક ટાઈમ્સPune MirrorBangalore MirrorAhmedabad MirrorItsMyAscentEducation TimesBrand CapitalMumbai MirrorTimes NowIndiatimesमहाराष्ट्र टाइम्सವಿಜಯ ಕರ್ನಾಟಕGo GreenAdAge IndiaEisamayIGN IndiaIamGujaratTimes of IndiaSamayam TamilSamayam TeluguMiss KyraBombay TimesFilmipopGames AppMX PlayerNewspaper SubscriptionTimes PrimeColombia Ads and Publishing
DOWNLOAD ET APP

FOLLOW US ON

BECOME A MEMBER
Terms of Use & Grievance Redressal Policy
Privacy Policy|Feedback
Copyright © 2019 Bennett, Coleman & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved. For reprint rights:
Times Syndication Service