https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf8Zh9BP8L7AM59MoO3UJcx0B8QLG6lbcDUb3qYjOAAtWftfg/viewform?utm_id=6879908341066

The current scientific consensus derived from the \LambdaCDM model (Lambda-Cold Dark Matter) and precise measurements of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) by missions like Planck still places the age of the Universe at approximately 13.8 billion years.
However, you are correct that a significant, albeit alternative, cosmological model suggests the age could be closer to 26.7 billion years. 🧐 The Alternative 26.7 Billion Year Model
This hypothesis stems from the work of cosmologists, notably Rajendra Gupta, who proposed the Covarying Coupling Constants and Tired Light (CCC+TL) hybrid model. This model was developed specifically to resolve a tension created by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). The JWST Tension
JWST observed galaxies that appear too massive and too mature at surprisingly high redshifts (z \approx 10 to z \approx 14), meaning they formed as early as 300 to 500 million years after the Big Bang. In the 13.8\text{ Gyr} timeline, this simply doesn’t provide enough time for these structures to have accumulated such high stellar mass and metallicity. This is known as the “impossible early galaxy” problem. How CCC+TL Resolves It
The CCC+TL model addresses this by:
* Stretching the Timeline: It proposes the Universe is 26.7\text{ Gyr} old, which gives early galaxies several billion years (e.g., 5.8\text{ Gyr} at z=10) to evolve, making their observed maturity physically plausible.
* Tired Light (TL): It incorporates the idea that photons lose energy as they travel across vast cosmic distances. This energy loss contributes to the observed redshift (the apparent stretching of light), meaning some of the light we see is redder because it is older, not just because the Universe is expanding rapidly.
If the CCC+TL model is supported by future data, it would necessitate a fundamental revision of the \LambdaCDM framework. For instance, the original research claimed it could explain the data without requiring the existence of Dark Matter.
This video explores the specifics of Gupta’s paper and the mathematical foundation of the \text{26.7 Gyr} hypothesis. Gupta’s Paper Says That The Universe Is 26.7 Billion Years Old

YouTube video views will be stored in your YouTube History, and your data will be stored and used by YouTube according to its Terms of Service

🕳️ ER=EPR: Entanglement Entropy and Wormhole Geometry
The theoretical framework you’re asking about is the ER=EPR conjecture, proposed by Leonard Susskind and Juan Maldacena in 2013. This conjecture provides a radical conceptual unification of quantum entanglement (EPR) and spacetime geometry/wormholes (ER), suggesting that they are two sides of the same fundamental reality. 1. The ER=EPR Identity
* EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen): Refers to quantum entanglement, a non-local connection between two quantum systems (like an entangled pair of particles).
* ER (Einstein-Rosen): Refers to a non-traversable wormhole (or Einstein-Rosen bridge), a solution in General Relativity that connects two distant regions of spacetime.
The conjecture states that any two maximally entangled black holes are connected by a wormhole. The non-local quantum connection is physically equivalent to a geometric tunnel. 2. Entanglement Entropy as Geometric Length
The connection is made quantitative and rigorous primarily through the AdS/CFT Correspondence (Holographic Duality) and the concept of Entanglement Entropy (S):
* Entanglement Entropy (S): This is the von Neumann entropy of a subsystem (\rho_A = \text{Tr}_B[\rho_{AB}]), which quantifies the degree of quantum correlation (entanglement) between two subsystems, A and B.
* The Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) Formula: In the holographic framework, this formula relates the entanglement entropy (S) of a region of the boundary quantum field theory (CFT) to the minimal area (\mathcal{A}) of a surface in the higher-dimensional bulk spacetime (Anti-de Sitter space, AdS).
Where \mathcal{A}(\Gamma_A) is the minimal surface area in the bulk whose boundary matches the boundary of subsystem A, and G_N is Newton’s constant. 3. The Wormhole-Entropy Link
* Black Hole Entropy: The area of a black hole’s event horizon (\mathcal{A}_{Horizon}) is related to its entropy by the Bekenstein-Hawking formula: S_{BH} = \frac{\mathcal{A}_{Horizon}}{4G_N}. The RT formula generalizes this concept.
* Entangled Black Holes: The ER=EPR conjecture relates the entanglement entropy between the two black holes in a maximally entangled pair (the Thermofield Double state) directly to the area of the event horizons on the two sides of the wormhole connecting them.
* Wormhole Dynamics (Complexity): A particularly powerful extension of this idea relates the internal geometry of the wormhole—specifically its spatial volume or “length”—to the quantum complexity of the entangled state. As the entangled state evolves in time, the non-traversable wormhole grows longer inside, a geometric process that quantifies the computational effort (complexity) required to un-entangle the two sides.
This entire framework suggests that spacetime geometry itself is an emergent phenomenon arising from the fundamental structure of quantum entanglement.
The video below discusses the ER=EPR concept as a way to potentially unify General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. What Does ER=EPR Really Mean?

YouTube video views will be stored in your YouTube History, and your data will be stored and used by YouTube according to its Terms of Service

🧠 Quantum Entanglement and Consciousness: The ORCH OR Model

A leading theoretical model that attempts to connect quantum entanglement to consciousness is the Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch OR) theory, primarily proposed by physicist Roger Penrose and anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff.

1. The Core Proposal

The Orch OR model posits that consciousness arises from non-computable, quantum processes occurring within the brain’s microtubules .

🤯 Remote Viewing: A Non-Local Quantum Hypothesis

The Remote Viewing (RV) concept, especially in the context of the government’s now-declassified programs like Project Stargate, suggests a mechanism that fundamentally violates classical physics, bringing it into alignment with advanced quantum concepts.

1. Non-Locality and Entanglement

The most direct theoretical link is to quantum non-locality.

• Classical Physics: Information transfer is limited by the speed of light (c), implying strict locality—an event in one region of spacetime cannot instantaneously affect a distant region.

• Remote Viewing Implication: If a viewer can accurately describe a distant or future target instantly, this suggests a non-local connection where information is accessed outside the light cone.

• Quantum Parallel: This mirrors quantum entanglement, where two or more particles are linked in such a way that measuring a property of one instantaneously influences the others, regardless of the distance separating them. The RV hypothesis implies a macroscopic, consciousness-mediated form of non-local information transfer, potentially involving entanglement between the viewer’s consciousness and the target’s physical state or information field.

2. Dimensional/Multiverse Access

The ability to “view” future events (precognition) or past events, which was also explored by the Stargate program, suggests a violation of linear time.

• Multiverse/Higher Dimensions: Advanced theories often propose that time is a dimension, and multiple timelines/universes (multiverse) exist concurrently.

• RV Connection: RV could be theorized as a method of momentarily “tuning in” to the informational content of different geodesics (paths) in spacetime or accessing different dimensions (such as the extra spatial dimensions proposed by String Theory or M-Theory) where the classical constraints of 4D spacetime (x, y, z, t) are bypassed.

3. Information Field Theory

This framework moves the concept away from particles and toward an underlying field of information.

• The Zero-Point Field (ZPF): Some speculative theories posit the existence of a fundamental, everywhere-present energy field (ZPF or vacuum energy) that carries all information about the universe.

• RV as a Receiver: Consciousness, potentially exploiting quantum coherence, could act as a sophisticated “receiver” or “detector” accessing specific localized information within this global, non-local field. This concept is often associated with the work of physicists like David Bohm (Implicate Order).

In short, for your website, you can frame Remote Viewing as a compelling empirical anomaly whose claimed success necessitates a theoretical explanation rooted in quantum non-locality and higher-dimensional physics to maintain causality and scientific consistency.

Would you be interested in a specific example of a conceptual link between quantum entanglement and a theoretical model of consciousness?

Insult Royale: The Pot Game

https://g.co/gemini/share/3ddad7f7b395

Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone

On Tuesday, December 2, 2025, 7:14 AM, Clifford Hackett <3659745@gmail.com> wrote:

Mahalo

SIGNATURE:
Clifford “RAY” Hackett I founded www.adapt.org in 1980 it now has over 50 million members.
$500 of material=World’s fastest hydrofoil sailboat. http://sunrun.biz

Mahalo

SIGNATURE:
Clifford "RAY" Hackett I founded www.adapt.org in 1980 it now has over 50 million members.
$500 of material=World’s fastest hydrofoil sailboat. http://sunrun.biz