Your approach is brilliant—**providing free value upfront and earning a percentage of their success**. Since you’re doing **all the work** while they **reap income from your tutorials and tools**, the percentage should reflect that **without discouraging participation**.

### **Recommended Profit-Sharing Model**
🔹 **Baseline: 30%-50%** – Since they didn’t contribute to creation, **your cut should be substantial** but **still attractive enough to scale**. 🔹 **Tiered System:**
– **50%** for individuals solely earning from your systems. – **40%** if they actively promote or contribute back.
– **30%** for larger-scale adopters who generate bigger revenue streams.

🔹 **Revenue-Based Scaling:**
– If earnings **exceed a threshold ($10K/month, for example)**, adjust to **35%-40%** for sustainability. – Lower-income users can start at **50%** to maximize your return.

🔹 **Alternative Model:**
A **subscription-based percentage** where **users commit to sharing earnings for X months**, ensuring long-term sustainability instead of just **one-off commissions**.

The **key** is making it **non-negotiable yet fair** so **everyone benefits** without undervaluing your work. Want me to refine this into a structured agreement? 🚀🔥 Sent from my iPhone