And Google all the names there and the incidence and the date
Monthly Archives: April 2020
Dr. Charles Lieber,
NEWSLIVE TV
APPMAGAZINE
NewsFact CheckFact Check: Truth of corona conspiracy theory behind arrest of Harvard professor
Fact Check: Truth of corona conspiracy theory behind arrest of Harvard professor
Amid the coronavirus pandemic, a conspiracy theory is viral on social media. A message with a video clip is circulating on Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp claiming that US authorities have arrested Dr Charles Lieber, a Harvard professor, for creating coronavirus and selling it to China.


Chayan Kundu
New Delhi
April 5, 2020UPDATED: April 5, 2020 22:24 IST

India Today Anti Fake News War Room (AFWA) has found the claim to be misleading. (File image: Reuters)
Amid the coronavirus pandemic, a conspiracy theory is viral on social media. A message with a video clip is circulating on Facebook, Twitter and WhatsApp claiming that US authorities have arrested Dr Charles Lieber, a Harvard professor, for creating coronavirus and selling it to China.

India Today Anti Fake News War Room (AFWA) has found the claim to be misleading. Dr Charles Lieber was arrested in January 2020 for lying and making fraudulent statements to US federal authorities about funds he had allegedly received from the Chinese government. His arrest has no connection to coronavirus.
Facebook users such as "Alex Alvarez" and "Meera Singh" have posted the video – a clipping of US news channel "WCVB" – with the caption, "USA just discovered the man who manufactured and sold the #coronavirus to #China. Dr #CharlesLieber, head of the chemistry and biology department at #HarvardUniversity, USA. He was just arrested today according to American department sources."
The archived versions can be seen here and here.
The claim is viral on Facebook and Twitter.
Why was Dr Lieber arrested?
Dr Charles Lieber is a nanoscientist and has no connection to coronavirus. News of his arrest was reported widely by the mainstream US media. According to "The New York Times", the Harvard professor was accused of concealing Chinese funding. He was not arrested for spying or accused of sending any sensitive information to China.
Dr Lieber was arrested in January 2020 by US federal authorities for "making a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement" on funds he received from China.

According to the US Department of Justice statement, on January 28, 2020, Dr Lieber, who has served as principal investigator of Lieber Research Group at Harvard University, which specialises in nanoscience, got more than $15 million in grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defense (DOD).
These grants require the disclosure of significant foreign financial conflicts of interest, including financial support from foreign governments or foreign entities.
But Dr Lieber was also a "strategic scientist" at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and a contractual participant in China’s "Thousand Talents Plan" and received a huge amount of money from the Chinese government. It is alleged he kept this information as secret and did not inform either Harvard University or US authorities.
The "Thousand Talents Plan" is one of China’s most prominent programmes designed to attract and recruit overseas talents and foreign experts to contribute to its scientific development.
Conclusion
It is true that Dr Charles Lieber, a Harvard professor, was arrested by US federal authorities for concealing the fact that he received huge money from the Chinese government and worked as a "strategic scientist" at China’s Wuhan University of Technology. But US authorities have not found any connection of Dr Lieber with coronavirus.
INDIA TODAY FACT CHECK

Claim
Dr. Charles Lieber, a Harvard professor, was arrested for creating coronavirus and selling it to China.
Conclusion
Dr Charles Lieber was arrested by US authorities for concealing Chinese funding. This arrest has no connection to coronavirus.
JHOOTH BOLE KAUVA KAATE
The number of crows determines the intensity of the lie.
1 Crow: Half True2 Crows: Mostly lies3 Crows: Absolutely false
Want to send us something for verification? Please share it on our at 73 7000 7000 You can also send us an email at factcheck
Get real-time alerts and all the news on your phone with the all-new India Today app. Download from

Next

RELATED
Fact Check: Did Brazilians observe PM Modi’s ‘lights out’ call?
Fact Check: Viral lockdown phases to control Covid-19 have not been endorsed b..

Fact Check: Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi’s old video shared with coronavirus..
Fact Check: Misleading claim about Covid-19 patient goes viral
RECOMMENDED
PUBLICATIONS:
Business Today
Cosmopolitan
India Today – Hindi
India Today
Mail Today
Money Today
Reader’s Digest
Time
TELEVISION:
Aaj Tak
Delhi Aaj Tak
India Today TV
Tez
RADIO:
Ishq FM
EDUCATION:
India Today Education
Vasant Valley
Best Colleges India 2018
Best Universities India 2018
ONLINE SHOPPING:
EVENTS:
Agenda Aajtak
India Today Conclave
Robb Report India 2018
Sahitya Aaj Tak
The Red Lab
PRINTING:
Thomson Press
WELFARE
Care Today
MUSIC:
Music Today
SYNDICATIONS:
India content
Headlines Today
DISTRIBUTION:
Rate Card
USEFUL LINKS :
Partners
Press Release
Sitemap
News
Newsletter
Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2020 Living Media India Limited. For reprint rights: Syndications Today
▲
The United States has just discovered the man who made and sold the Corona virus to China – Trendy Buzz Feed
Saipan Resort In Mariana Islands – Pacific Islands Club Saipan
Make more ventilators
April 6, 2020,07:10pmx
You have undoubtedly read or heard that we don’t have enough ventilators in this country to help Covid-19 victims breathe, especially in coronavirus hot spots like New York City, northern New Jersey, Detroit and New Orleans where hospitals need hundreds (if not thousands) of additional mechanized units.
In the face of this lopsided supply and demand dynamic, there is another more insidious problem lurking in that the prevailing design of manual ventilators (commonly known as Ambu bag resuscitators, which date from the 1950s) does not allow respiratory therapists or ambulatory technicians to precisely control the amount of oxygen that is pumped into the damaged lungs of those suffering from Covid-19. When you consider the incredible strain on first responders and medical staff in the throes of this pandemic, and the vulnerability of coronavirus patients, over-inflation of delicate lung tissues may well lead to routine violations of the Hippocratic oath: first do no harm.
As to the quantity conundrum, President Trump (finally) last week exercised his authority under the Defense Production Act (DPA) to supply components and compel manufacture of these critical devices. This will begin to address a severe shortage that may leave New York City hospitals without an adequate number of ventilators within days, even after California and Oregon have shipped ventilators east and the Federal government has distributed about half of the units stockpiled in the national reserve.
ResMed, one of the leading domestic manufacturers of ventilators, is “maximizing its production” of ventilators and bilevel non-invasive breathing machines, said CEO Mick Farrell.
Farrell emphasized that the rate-limiting issue that has slowed production acceleration has been their inability to gain “priority access to the [ventilator] components.” The DPA is intended to address this very issue, but the White House appeared reluctant to issue an executive order as the public health crisis intensified. For its part, ResMed said that it has been “actively engaging with key government officials” both here and abroad for weeks and that, notwithstanding any component supply limitations, it began ramping up production in early January as soon as the outbreak was detected in China. The company aims to double or even triple its annual production of ventilators and bilevels this year.
Another option to increase ventilator supply could be the conversion of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP or BPAP) machines typically used for treatment of sleep apnea.
A ResMed spokesperson suggested that this could be done but would require “significant rework to function as a ventilator.” A nascent effort to do just that is underway based upon work done by faculty at the University of California, Berkeley and the University of California, San Francisco. The effort appears to be consistent with new FDA guidelines that support “flexible . . . manufacturer modifications made to ventilators, anesthesia gas machines and other respiratory devices, and their accessories, in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency.”
Under a new schematic design co-developed by Berkeley mechanical engineering professor Grace O’Connell, the modified CPAP machine accepts oxygen where ambient air enters the device. The oxygenated air is then filtered and delivered to a patient through an FDA-approved endotracheal tube, and the exhaled air is re-filtered before being released. O’Connell emphasized that using an endotracheal tube bypasses the need for face masks, which could spread disease if aerosolized viruses escape.
A man wears a mask while walking past Sather Gate[+]
ASSOCIATED PRESS
The Berkeley innovation has morphed into a volunteer community effort, led by two students and centered in the San Francisco Bay Area. The group is appealing to sleep apnea sufferers to donate their CPAP or BIPAP machines to be converted, and is optimistic that they can make an impact on addressing the shortfall based upon estimates that there are 8-10 million such machines in American households that could be converted. Notably, both the devices and components necessary to convert them are readily available and therefore could be put into the market more quickly than newly manufactured units.
Converted CPAP machines would not take the place of a mechanical ventilator employed in hospital intensive care units, but could be used in the field to supplement existing Ambu bags. These manually controlled bag ventilators are used to administer short-term respiratory support in ambulances and emergency rooms until patients can be placed on mechanical ventilators that deliver controlled breath sizes.
Currently, respiratory therapists (or worse, harried ambulatory or emergency professionals) must manually squeeze a hard, plastic balloon-like sphere to deliver air into the lungs of patients who can no longer breath sufficiently on their own. Many intuit that the lungs are simply empty vessels and that the risk to patients lies in providing too little oxygen, given the patient circumstances. But the bigger challenge is to do this cautiously so as to avoid lung hyperinflation that damages the delicate alveoli air sacs. This damage often is not apparent at the time but becomes evident within days as the body triggers an inflammatory response with severe implications that can lead to organ failure and death.
Peer reviewed publications on the advantages of so-called low-tidal-volume ventilation (and the costs and risks associated with excess volume ventilation) suggest that about 75,000 Americans die each year from complications associated with acute lung injury, more than die from breast and prostate cancer combined. Moreover, treatment associated with lung damage resulting from hyperinflation costs an estimated $20 billion per year.
In fact, no currently available bag used in the field promotes compliance to metrics established by the American Heart Association and the European Resuscitation Council, according to Dr. Michael Peck. Peck is a board-certified anesthesiologist and chief medical officer of AirMid Critical Care Products, a startup venture company focused on developing and commercializing an innovative volume-controlled manual ventilator. [In full disclosure, my law firm is advising the company on regulatory matters.]
“We have been working on this technology to promote guideline-compliant breaths from resuscitators for some time, but the coronavirus has given us a heightened sense of urgency to move from prototype to finished product as quickly as possible,” Peck said. “With the exposure to potential lung injury from non-compliant ventilators, we are focused on making a product that addresses this safety issue.” The company believes that widespread use of its guideline-compliant manual ventilators will reduce lung injuries and save massive healthcare system costs.
One intriguing, though perhaps unanswerable, question is whether deaths caused by acute lung damage will be wrongly attributed to Covid-19?
“I have had discussions with a number of my colleagues around the country, and some of us suspect that a portion of the death toll attributed to the coronavirus actually is being caused by excess manual lung inflation – whether in an ambulance or in a crowded hospital hallway – so that the patient’s lungs are irreparably harmed,” Peck noted. “This is yet another aspect of the tragedy of this ongoing public health crisis, but if we can build enough of these ventilators we may not need to make painful decisions as to who gets one and who doesn’t. This certainly won’t be our last pandemic.”
John Osborn
I have been a senior executive with life sciences and healthcare companies, including a Merck joint venture, McKesson Specialty Health/US Oncology, and Cephalon. I now…Read More
© 2020 Forbes Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
AdChoicesPrivacy StatementTerms and ConditionsContact UsJobs At ForbesReprints & PermissionsForbes Press RoomAdvertise
2485798051 skype
2485798051
+1 248 579 8051
Skype+1 248 579 8051