IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Case =

Plaintiff: Clifford "RAY" Hackett

vs.

Defendants:Jacqueline Hackett, Maureen O’donnell, Gina Reyes

COMPLAINT: Comes now the plaintiff, Clifford “RAY” Hackett, pro se, and says:

PARTIES:

1. Plaintiff, Clifford “RAY” Hackett, is a US citizen hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff".

2. Defendant Maureen O’Donnell is the manager of Hilo Social Security office at 111 puainako, Hilo, HI 96720 and is hereinafter referred to as “Maureen.”

3. Defendant, Jacqueline Hackett,is an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT, A FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE, WITH A LIFE SENTENCE in her country, the philippines AND RESIDES at: Hilton Hotel Durango 501 Camino Del Rio,and is hereinafter referred to as “Jaki.”

4. Defendant Gina Reyes

FACTS PERTAINING TO THE PARTIES

5. Exhibit1 lists crimes by defendants.

6. Exhibit2 is discussion

E. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Defendants violated numerous national laws, statutes, ordinances and regulations, including but not limited to: due process, right not to be deprived of property under the 5th amendment (as incorporated to the states through the 14th amendment) and plaintiff’s right to be heard which was denied. The overt acts of fraud and collusion in this matter which were engaged in by the defendants to deprive plaintiff of his assets include, but are not limited to Providing false information to the court.This case warrants claims involving tort of outrage, bad faith, outrageous government conduct and manifest injustice. The defendant’s acts and failures to act are criminal in nature as they are indicative of legalized stealing from the plaintiff, and depict “the dagger of an assassin” in their actions toward him. Accordingly, plaintiff is justified in alleging each of the following claims against the defendants.

F. CAUSES OF ACTION: Violations of Plaintiffs’ 5th Amendment Rights (as incorporated via 14th Amendment)

7. The conduct of the defendants constitutes a violation of plaintiff’s rights under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution, as incorporated to the States through the 14th Amendment.

8. The defendants owed plaintiff a duty under the 5th and 14th Amendments not to violate his rights under the United States Constitution as a citizen of the United States. The defendant’s fraud denied plaintiff due process of law.

9. The conduct of the defendants to participate in a conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of his income and his right to be heard was an obvious interference due process.

10. Plaintiff relied in good faith that the defendants would act legally and ethically.

11. The illegal and unethical conduct of the defendants constitutes denial of plaintiff’s due process rights under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution.

12. The defendants breached plaintiff’s rights and willfully deprived him of his property and his right to be heard.

13. Due to defendant’s deprivation of plaintiff’s rights, plaintiff has suffered damages.

WHEREFORE, plaintiff respectfully requests judgments of the court against all of the defendants awarding to plaintiff (i) damages for each defendant; (ii) pre- and post-judgment interest; (iv) costs, including reasonable attorney fees for this action; and (v) any other relief deemed just and equitable by the court.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff respectfully requests that the issues in this matter be heard by a jury.

DESIGNATION OF TRIAL: Plaintiff designates Hawaii as the location for the trial in this matter.

I HEREBY CERTIFY: the foregoing was sent to defendants the same day as to this court.